Now We the People
Newtown

Discussion 6: 'The Changing Agenda of Women'

30th of June 2001.
Presentation by Zora Simic

Attendance: Michele Freeman, David McKnight, Veronica Taylor, Jon Phillips, Russ Aroney, Muriel Horton, Ann McArthur, Pam Little, Gordana Simic, Camile.

Zora began the discussion by talking briefly of her background in studying the history of Australian feminism, the period she studies is between 1920s-70s. Zora talked briefly about identity and culture and also questioned the changing nature of feminism.

Participants asked some general questions about the Now We The People conference itself. Having specific women's issues on the agenda of the conference/workshop was raised, especially issues relating to older women.

In reference to the history of feminism the point was raised that in the 1800s 'class' was not the only issue that women organised under. Likewise today we are witnessing a 'coming together' of women on issues, this was illustrated by the S11 and M1 protests.

This in turn raised the point of difference among women and that although we are witnessing a convergence of many movements in response to corporate globalisation, it is important to recognise difference/diversity and to not subsume women's issues under a broader umbrella of movements.

Following on from this there was discussion that the movement against corporate globalisation has brought people/groups together, but it is still important for such groups to retain a sense of autonomy. One participant expressed that feminism has had such a long existence and that it needs to stand on its own.

Some members of the group shifted the discussion by raising the issue of feminism and the younger generation. It was argued that younger women were no longer interested in feminism, and a reminder of what rights women previously did not have and what rights are still threatened is needed. The group then discussed why young women may not identify as feminists. There was a suggestion that 'feminism' is a debased term. Another suggestion was that feminism was not inclusive enough.

This led on to the point that feminism has always struggled with identity, but has tried to recognise difference and not exclude anyone.

Following on from the points about younger women not identifying as feminists, someone asker how could feminism be revitalised. Activism and discussion were both seen as important. The point was also made that some younger women may have different perceptions of feminism, and rather than make the link to politics, they make their expression through culture and dress etc.

From here discussion went back to the point of not having women's issues subsumed and how this could be prevented. It was noted that fundamental change is needed and that this takes a long time. A point was also made that everyone has different ideas about when it is that 'pivotal' changes have occurred.

On the issue of what can be done now (how do we weave movements and not have their agendas subsumed) the group generally agreed that tactical alliances are needed.

From this point discussion moved onto the concept of a 'fair go'. There was debate as to whether this ethos ever really existed. Some felt it was stronger in the past, others argued that it was hollow rhetoric

The effects of corporate globalisation on people today were also discussed, and it was asked how could the people adversely affected by this be helped. It was suggested that there is a convergence happening that is attempting to take this trend on, and it was generally agreed that the biggest threat at the moment is corporate globalisation.